The productivity and collaboration tools market has grown to be worth around €9bn globally and the active user share is phenomenal. Slack is the platform most have probably heard of but there are many and often have simple names like Fleep, Hangouts, Simpplr, Jostle to name a few.
The projected worth of the industry is an interesting statistic but for the purposes of this post, it’s a secondary metric by comparison to active daily users.
Did you know?
According to DMR, Slack alone has over 9 million weekly active users with 140 minutes spent on the platform each weekday. Now, scale that figure up for the list of collaboration tools on the market — truly staggering use that rivals the original telephone.
This points to the rise of asynchronous – well… you’d have to say established — communication methodologies. Blueface focus on perfecting real-time communications — such as 1-to-1 hosted voice, call conferencing and video — while reducing access barriers and workplace disruption.
The big question is: does the sole use of collaboration software tools actually increase productivity or are extra tools needed?
A new adage that I’ve fallen in love with goes something like “we can send a message around the world in less than a second, but is anybody really listening?”
The high volume of incoming messages and notification jingles from instant messaging apps can leave staff overwhelmed and your message devalued.
Is anyone listening?
This incredible video — Vhils: Communication — outlines how much communication has changed since the invention of the telephone.
These applications remain open all day, leading to ease-of-access to information and to-a-certain-extent a mountain of information to wade through.
According to Blueface BCT Report 2018, meetings are the most disruptive process in their workflow. As mentioned in our introduction, these tools are tantamount to a constant, semi-synchronous meeting.
More time on the instant messaging app, either reading or responding to the different chats for long periods of time, can lead to the low productivity. People are disruptively reactive to productivity platforms – such as Slack – when a message comes in, and they want to respond immediately before it’s too late.
25% of professionals surveyed told ReportLinker they feel the pressure to answer IM’s right away, even if they’re in the middle of other work.
It is a very fast-paced service, so there is often no time to contemplate before responding to the messages.
Every company should practice open lines of communication but considering how nonconstructive many instant messages or emails can be employees will often find themselves distracted.
A study on ReportLinker showed that instant messaging practices are becoming very popular in the tech industry. 71% of employees rely on the application and in international companies, it is used by 62% of the workforce.
International time zone differences are a big contributing factor to productivity tool distraction. Instant messaging apps are very “in the moment”, where people chat back and forth instantly, searching and trying to find pertinent details in the conversation can be tricky.
Did you know?
According to the Wall Street Journal, researchers from the University of California Irvine shadowed workers on the job and studied their productivity in the workplace. After distractions or interruptions in someone’s work, it takes an average employee about 23 minutes to get back to the task.
With constant interruptions and the total number of minutes adding up after each distraction, it can take a lot of time away from work that needs to be completed. These progressive interruptions in work lead to low productivity in the workspace.
With Unified Communications, it is a non-disruptive approach to communications where it decreases overall disruption. Every touchpoint of your communications unified fax, email, voice — all-in-one.
The access to communicate with people all over the world is also very easy to connect with, whereas, with online messaging systems, it may take more time to receive an answer.
Voice can resolve many problems listed above in moments. Customers and employees can communicate effectively through voice communications so every message lands the way it was intended.
Lack of Organization
The irony of project management augmenters is the real-time nature of conversation. Really important information gets buried in channels easily and can be difficult to recover.
Live chats – while an excellent way to communicate intermittently – can lack context and organization. There is an immediate response pressure and messages mount up quickly. Long in nature conversations and constant topic switching are other noticeable quirks of productivity tools.
Even though there are keyword search functions, all of the messages and conversations are clumped together, leading to no organization in the chat.
Many conversations in engagement software tools will get crowded out and disappear within a day due to a large number of messages being exchanged. The most important details that were said in the morning may be lost by early afternoon or even an hour after that chat was sent due to the abundance of message exchanges occurring.
While it is important to reinforce with copy, voice establishes a quick understanding of what is being communicated.
Voice communication in combination with other tools creates a perfect communicative ecosystem – vital for any organization. The Blueface UC Portal unites myriad communication methods under one umbrella.
Priceless GIF from Keyandpeele GIFs